Only of value if this could be done exactly as they were the first time since this is basically detective work at this point. The basic approach seems to be fine so the devil will be in the implementation.
Ok, so I got it to work, but it’s not at all like the video.
I use ‘Current Position’ after setting the laser in the corner of the jig and throughout the process. That turns out to be x45,y45, and both the Laser box 9 dots in the upper right and the 9 dots in the toolbar are the same.
Cut the oval or whatever your job is.
Flip the drawing, and change both nine dots to be the lower left. Add 300 to the Y axis in the toolbar, and reposition the flipped workpiece to the lower part of the jig, which is 300mm inside the legs.
Burn again, and it does what I want.
I know it seems to be a lot of monkey motion, but, most importantly, it works, and two, just flipping the work like we think would work really doesn’t. I think it’s too dependent on the work being square and precisely measuring the width of the job. Both of those are achievable, but the method above works dependably.
I thank everyone for their input!
This is different than what was in your design. Refer below.
So overall height of jig here is 300 mm? This is contrary to below which shows a jig size of 365mm based on the design. So the design files you had relies on an internal jig height of 365.
I’m glad you have something that works although I suspect it won’t work generally for all designs since you’re moving from top-right job origin to bottom-left. You’re indexing on two dimensions rather than a single dimension.
However, either there’s something fundamentally wrong with the function of your machine of there’s a gap in the workflow.
This topic was automatically closed 30 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.