On your square with clipped corners the skew and trap should be affecting both the source and the framing laser the same amount as far as I understand the mechanics. If you are changing the redlight laser without affecting the source laser with skew and trapezoid something strange is going on. Unless I’m missing something.
Ran some tests. 175X175 F254 lens. BJJCZ Lite board. at 100% the square is almost 200x200, (with no corrections) but projects fine. Both the redlight and the source laser close to same dimensions
https://youtu.be/4uxDZ5FVR_Y
at 100mm setting 57.1% (Same lens) the projected square is 115mm.
https://youtu.be/GltYUkzNJ3Y
So reducing the field size and test area settings scale reduces the calibration square projected by both the redlight and the source (on my machine)
LB 2.0.02
After running the rest of the test and then the scale utility:
So if you notice on the 57.1% test, it projects the vertical and horizontal lines off the edge of the screen but still makes the smaller box and is close to the red light framing size.
If I didn’t know any better, I would think you really don’t have a 200x200 lens installed if, like you say, it clips the corners even at 100 (50%)
So some more questions, I know, I know…
When in focus, how far is the lens off the table?
What method are you using to assure the lens is in focus?
Did you change the adapter ring?
Is the lens and adapter ring screwed in tight?
What is the numbering/ lettering on the ring, for example my lens says F-Theta Lens F=254mm
This equates to 175x175 working area. if you have a 200x200 installed, F theta would be like around F=290.
Let me know.
Here is a video with intentional skew and trap way off. Burn (Source Laser) and Framing (red Light) laser skew and trap identically.