5W UV Engraving inside glass doesn't fill

Hello Laser Friends!

I have started working with a JPT 5W UV Laser, and got it running with LB, and I’ve come across a weird headscratcher while trying to do sub-surface engraving on glass/crystal:
It seems that I can engrave under the surface properly with lines, but it will not fill. I had very similar settings in Fill and Line mode, and am perplexed as to why I only see the lines. Anyone here have any experience with this?

Note that filling works fine on the surface and on Stainless steel and wood and whatever else i’ve tried. In fact, when I did my test, I had an aluminum business card under it, and it engraved the fill on the card instead of inside the crystal.

My Setup:
Source= JPT seal-55-5SE
Controller=BSL
Galvo=Sino-Galvo RC 1001
LB Ver: LightBurn Pro 2.0.05
Computer: Mac Mini M4 2024.
OS: MacOS 15.1 (Sequoia)

Thanks!

-Thomas




Show us your preview screenshot.

You might have a duplicate object that is preventing the fill.

Preview looks correct. I figure it’s probably drawing correctly since it works on other materials. I think it’s just somehow not getting the same energy density in fill mode as it does in line mode?

Thanks for the suggestion! Any other ideas?

-Thomas

Here’s a video since it’s kinda hard to see in the pics:

-Thomas

Sorry, I am a diode guy. Maybe turn off the cross hatch and add another layer at 90 degrees instead?

And/or…turn off flood fill as a test?


I don’t know much about the physics involved with subsurface engraving, but the glass used seems to make a big difference.

As discovered by @cloxart in this thread Omni X crystal engraving inside a sphere? - #24 by cloxart


So the Lines engraved inside, and the Fill Sub-Layer went through the crystal engraved on the business card?
This is odd. I’m asuming, you didn’t change the focus. Can you confirm that?

Both the Fill and Line Sub-Layers appear to use the same intensity settings.

Does it make a difference if you create a new separate Layer in fill mode?

of course, the correct focus height is paramount here

I’ve just added a note about this on your other thread: