If you need 100W then that’s great. The issue, as a hobbyist, was the cost. For my 60W MOPA, a regular lens is about $60, once I cross into the 100W and greater territory, my same focal length lens for 60W lens now costs about 8 times more at $480.
I have an F100mm, F160mm, F254mm and an F420mm lens for mine. The problem with an F100mm lens, is you can’t easily get into the small area with your hands and seeing it for focus is even worse. Of course, I wouldn’t be able to afford these lenses if mine were a 100W or more machine.
If you go from a longer lens to a shorter lens, the spot size is reduced. A 50% reduction in spot size relates to 1/4 the area or an apparent power increase of 4 times.
Most of the time I use my F254mm, lots of height so it’s easy to work with and keeps the lens away from the 175x175mm work area.
The difference between 100W and a 50W machine is the 100W pumps up the fiber twice as fast allowing more full power pulses/s. Of course you’re paying for it.
I’ve found 60W to be a nice power range. I can burn up objects, putting more power in, doesn’t necessarily give you a faster job…it could burn your material up real fast.
I’d suggest you get an F420mm (300x300mm coverage) as this will come with a tall column (mines 80cm). I actually use the F420mm quite often doing rocks. The taller column allows strange size rocks to be placed where they can be lased.
Mother nature doesn’t seem to make really flat rocks often enough, the extra 13mm of depth of focus using an F420mm is really handy for irregular sized rocks.
Even though @bernd.dk doesn’t have a MOPA, I think his insight is right on…
Good luck.
