I am asking these questions so I understand exactly what the situation is on your end.
A measuring magnifier dramatically simplifies making the measurements and gives good accuracy for the values.
Are you using one?
Here’s a test layout for measuring the scanning offset:
Simple Scanning Offset Test.lbrn2 (7.0 KB)
It’s done with LB V 2.0 RC5, so if you’re using a different version you may get a warning; it should work fine.
Running it on paper will produce the column of five blocks on the left:
The power levels will not be correct for your machine, but the range of speeds should be OK. Obviously, 15% of 60 W at 100 mm/s is too spicy for the paper I used.
Turn off layer C02 (the red one) and it’ll produce the middle column minus the outline.
I turned the the Scanning Offset Adjustment off to get the right column. If you measure the offsets between adjacent lines, they’ll be pretty close to what’s in the table for my machine:
Turn the Scanning Offset Adjustment on your controller off, run the test as-is (with the outline rectangles on C02), take a good detailed picture of the result, and let’s see the starting point.

