The rectangular beam was one of the main reasons why I changed the laser head for another one with a square beam.
For projects that require more precision it makes a significant difference!
Which one is this? Didn’t know anyone made a square emitter…
Even being square, the hypotenuse distance is different from purely X and Y direction size…
If it’s not round, you end up with the same issue, don’t you?
Anything other than round is not optimal, but there is a huge difference if you have a 1:3 ratio elongated beam or a beam with 1:1 …….
This is the one with rectangular beam:
And this is a LT 40W (power consuption) fixed focus with a square beam that I am using currently:
As far as I know the construction of this one consists of two rectangular laser LEDs mounted side by side.
But I never dared to take it apart to check the veracity of the information. 
Yes, of course, but as @bernd.dk mentioned:
And as far as I know, there is no round laser LED. (at least that I can buy without selling an organ) 
That’s exactly it for a diode - the beam can be rectangular. I’d assumed that I would either take an average or the largest kerf as my kerf setting, but your suggestion of different kerf settings for different x and y layers while sounding complicated could be an excellent solution for slots / tabs / “dove tails” - which for most of what I’ve done is where I’d want the higher tolerances.
But, bringing it back to the topic at hand, I think that I will build a kerf corrected version of this where I can just cut out the squares in any new material to get a kerf measurement. The nature of using squares is that I can check the X and Y kerfs separately - and make an informed decision.
Again, thank you for the idea!
I apologize if I didn’t understand your intention correctly due to my poor English, but…
Why, instead of building a corrected version, don’t you simply rotate the drawing 90º, identify it as “vertical kerf” for example and run the job? 
I’m looking to create a reusable tool - the “corrected” version won’t contribute to the kerf being measured, so using it with any material would be accurate. I can cut the caliper part once, and then just cut a set of squares to measure the result of a new material (or I suppose cut type). Note that I either need to increase the number of squares, or lower the denominator from 20 to 18 - as there would be two less cuts contributing to the kerf calculation…
This is square?
I believe there is a M2 value called beam quality that takes a lot of this into account.
This is my 20W (quad diode) output at focus distance onto painted aluminum. 1mm square with a pulsed dot at the center. The “dot” measured approx .09mm x .40mm
2 Likes
Well, it seemed to me that I hadn’t correctly understood your intention. 
It’s a blurred square. 
It is about 2m (not mm) away from the focus point.
So for me, who don’t need micrometric precision, it’s a perfect square at the focus point with the dimension (if I remember correctly) 0.02mm
Or not, because I see poorly and what is supposed to be a spot I see as a stain. 
I would say this would be the result I would get if I did the same with the previous laser.
I think General Motors calls that a “squircle”. (Reference C8 Corvette steering wheel publicity.)
Of course, in their infinite wisdom, they also decided to call the front storage compartment a “frunk”, so “squircle” probably isn’t a great term.
7 Likes
I vote that this measuring tool be added to the Laser Tools menu in LB
Upvote now.
3 Likes
Daww, you’re lovely!
If you do really want that stick it in the feature suggestions so the devs can see. 
2 Likes
I was hoping the author of the original file could update it? There are a couple of things that need updating. Firstly, the font needs to be changed to a system font or converted to a path. Secondly, the formula needs to be updated to take into account the fact that you multiply the end results by 1/2 to get your kerf offset.
I do feel like this would be a great addition to LightBurn software, if it was updated.
If the original author isn’t able to update the file then I will do it, but I want to give the original author the opportunity to do it themselves. If they don’t respond within a week I will edit the files myself and repost as updated Kerf Offset Test w/ Built in Venier Scale.
Cam
This measures kerf, not kerf offset. Not all kerf adjustments are 1/2 the actual kerf, you might want a tight, close or loose fit.
I’d say manipulating this would be detrimental to the whole idea. IMHO 
What font would you suggest?
2 Likes
Well, for the font, it doesn’t matter that much, as the writing can be “outlined” in Illustrator, for example, which turns the writing into actual paths. If I had to pick a font right off the top of my head, I would say Helvetica or Arial. I mean, if the text isn’t turned into a path, most computers would have Arial or Helvetica, probably more on the Arial side.