I’m interested in laser engraving on barrel stave and I’m wondering if Lightburn has the ability to use the Z-axis? I’m a novice at Lightburn, but I have run into a snag with the 3-D shape element.
Here is an example of what I was thinking:
Does Lightburn offer a solution to this (z-axis, focal length change, etc.)? If not, is there an alternative that I should use instead? I’m running a 7W JTech Laser on a Onefinity CNC.
LightBurn is resolutely 2.5 D, without any notion of dynamically controlling the Z axis during a cut. It can set specific Z axis positions for a layer, but there’s no way to vary the Z axis across / along an engraved design like those staves.
That’s the trick: for slightly curved surfaces, a lens with a sufficiently long focal length will have enough depth of field to cover the whole design from a single Z axis position.
Some previous discussions may provide a starting point:
That will be tricky to pull off with hobby equipment.
Not to mention with a 2.5D controlling software.
If Your One Finity CNC supports 3D engraving, IMO the easiest way to tackle this task would be to use some other software when engraving/marking curved objects.
Lightburn is truly a great software with a great team behind it, but there are lots of things it’s not capable of doing…yet .
In addition to those search hits @ednisley posted:
Not individual staves, but marking whole barrels was discussed in this:
thread.
As can be expected, that thread was derailed more than once, but there might be some nuggets of information that could be useful in Your case.
@thiggins, one possibility is to fabricate a custom roller mechanism to pass the barrel stave back and forth. With proper design, it could shuttle the stave back and forth while keeping the burn area at a fixed height. A NEMA 24 motor plugged into the Yaxis should have enough torque to move it. Then you could use Lightburn.
Thanks for all the great advice. I found an alternative solution by steam bending the barrel staves to be more flat. Since it is just g-code, I would have thought there might be a workaround using another piece of software to account for the changes in the z-axis.