I think it is more discernible at different speeds. Most of us don’t scan in the Y directions too much, I don’t think…
I would tend to agree with your analysis…
I just mentioned it because it looked like the pattern.
It would be easy to measure the belt teeth and compare with the image that is created. They should match if it’s ‘curtains’…
It looks exactly like that.
And this matches @Burn’s measurement of 2mm for both tooth pitch and band pitch.
I still think this is the best hypothesis but need to sort out the other non-compliant data.
I had similar issues with image, what did help as well as setting the DPI lower and speed and reducing the overscanning to 0.1% if Bi directional Scanning selected, try first with Bi directional scanning off, to see if the problem reduced if so then with over scan set to 0% with it on. it helped a lot ! but images are never as easy as they seem to achieve a good result. but hope this helps, worth a try at the least.
This topic was automatically closed 30 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.